ISKRIT / engineering reference ← to reference

Progress billing: percent complete, carry-forward and retention

Updated: 2026-08-13 · ISKRIT

Every billing period asks the same four questions of every line: what was done before, what was done this period, what that leaves, and how much of it is being held. Getting them consistent across a two-year job is the whole discipline.

The line arithmetic

For each item: completed to date equals previous plus this period, plus any materials delivered and stored on site. Percent complete is completed over scheduled. Balance to finish is scheduled minus completed. Retention is a percentage of completed, held back and carried forward.

The carry-forward is what makes the record cumulative rather than a stack of independent invoices. Each period starts from the last one, so a correction in period seven has to be made as a correction, not by quietly restating period six.

Why retention is per line

Applying the retention rate to the application total instead of to each line gives the same answer only while the rate is uniform and nothing is released. As soon as one section reaches practical completion and its retention is released while the rest continues, the total-based calculation cannot express the state of the job. Per-line retention also survives a rate that differs by work type, which is common where plant and materials are treated separately from labour.

Stored materials

QuestionUsual answerWhy it matters
Are stored materials billable?yes, if on site and insuredcash for material bought early
Are they in the retention base?usually yeschanges the held amount noticeably
What when they are installed?move from stored to completeddouble counting if the stored figure is not reduced

The third row is where the error lives. Material billed as stored in one period and again as completed in the next, without the stored figure coming down, is an overclaim that survives until someone reconciles the whole job.

The release nobody bills

Retention held at five or ten percent across a long contract is real money, and it is released in two stages: part at practical completion and the balance after the defects period. The second stage falls due months after the site team has moved on, and it is routinely forgotten. A running total of held-to-date, visible on every application, is what makes the final claim obvious rather than something to remember.

The number that reconciles everything

Contract sum, less completed to date, equals balance to finish. If that identity fails, either a variation was billed outside the schedule or a correction was made by restatement. Checking it every period localises the error to one month instead of leaving it to be found at closeout.

The cumulative work record tool carries each line forward across periods with its retention, and reports held-to-date so the release is billed rather than remembered.

More in the reference:
Rotating shift patterns: covering the posts and balancing the hours
Calibration intervals: setting them, shortening them, defending them
Turning an estimate into a bill of quantities that foots
Checking claimed quantities: the design schedule and the survey
Pile capacity from CPT: how the LCPC method reads a cone trace
Driven and bored piles: why the same soil gives different capacity
What belongs on a borehole log, and what quietly gets left off
Drawing a cross section: correlating layers between boreholes
From an AGS4 file to a laboratory summary: what the groups carry
Characteristic values: turning a set of test results into one number
Void ratio, porosity and saturation from one density test
When one soil layer is really two: splitting geotechnical units
ASTM D4253 and D4254: maximum and minimum index density
Relative density Dr and density index Id are not the same number
USCS classification step by step: ASTM D2487
Cu and Cc: what the two gradation coefficients actually tell you
Dual symbols in USCS: the 5 to 12 percent fines band
EN ISO 14688-1 against USCS: two different size ladders
AGS4 file validation: what the rules actually check
AGS4 syntax: the five rules that break a delivery
ASTM D2435 oedometer test: from the curve to Cc, mv and Eoed
Converting oedometer modulus to Young’s modulus
EN ISO 17892-5 and ASTM D2435: where the two diverge
ASTM D1196 plate load test: modulus and subgrade reaction
DIN 18134: Ev1, Ev2 and the compaction ratio
Ménard pressuremeter modulus: ASTM D4719 and EN ISO 22476-4
Permeability from a pumping test: the Dupuit formulas
Shewhart control chart constants: A2, A3, B3, B4, D3, D4, d2, c4
The eight out of control tests on a Shewhart chart
Repeatability and reproducibility limits: where 2.77 comes from
How rebar cutting plans are optimised: the cutting stock problem
Cutting waste in rebar fabrication: what percentage is normal
Rebound hammer calibration: why the factory curve is not enough
Kerf and offcut: what a linear cutting plan has to account for
Earthwork volume from survey points: grid, TIN and cross sections
Fire load density: the formula, the calorific values and the traps
Explosive atmosphere zones 0, 1, 2 and 20, 21, 22 explained
Pollution charges per tonne: how the over-limit multiplier works
The Russian environmental fee: who pays, when, and how the advances work