ISKRIT / engineering reference ← to reference

Pile capacity from CPT: how the LCPC method reads a cone trace

Updated: 2026-08-13 · ISKRIT

A cone penetration test gives a resistance every two centimetres down the profile. A pile needs two numbers: what the shaft carries and what the toe carries. The whole method is the rule for getting from one to the other.

Toe resistance: the averaging window

The toe of a pile does not feel the soil at exactly its own level. It feels a zone above and below, and a single cone reading at the toe elevation is therefore the wrong input. The LCPC procedure averages the cone resistance over a window of about 1.5 pile diameters above and below the toe, after clipping values that depart too far from the window mean.

The clipping step is what makes the method robust. Without it, one spike from a gravel clast sets the capacity of the whole pile, and a designer reading the printout has no way to see that it happened.

Shaft friction: resistance divided by a factor

Unit shaft friction at each depth is the cone resistance at that depth divided by a friction factor that depends on the soil and on how the pile is installed, then capped at a limiting value for that combination. A driven closed-end pile in dense sand and a bored pile in the same sand get different factors, because the installation either densifies the soil around the shaft or relaxes it.

InstallationEffect on the shaft
Driven, closed enddensifies the surrounding soil, highest friction factors
Driven, open endpartial plugging, intermediate
Bored, drysome relaxation, lower factors
Bored under slurrymost relaxation, lowest factors

The thin dense layer trap

A half-metre of dense sand inside soft clay shows on the trace as a sharp peak. If the pile toe happens to land in it, the averaging window pulls in the soft material above and below and the capacity drops back toward the clay value, which is correct: a thin layer cannot carry a pile whose failure surface passes straight through it. A calculation that reads the peak directly will overstate the toe capacity several times over.

What the method does not give you

Settlement. Capacity and settlement are separate questions, and a pile that satisfies the capacity check can still settle more than the structure tolerates. The load-settlement curve is a second calculation on the same data, and for piles in service under working load it is usually the governing one.

The pile capacity calculator plots the cone trace with the averaging window drawn on it, so the toe value can be seen in the context that produced it rather than taken on trust.

More in the reference:
Rotating shift patterns: covering the posts and balancing the hours
Calibration intervals: setting them, shortening them, defending them
Turning an estimate into a bill of quantities that foots
Progress billing: percent complete, carry-forward and retention
Checking claimed quantities: the design schedule and the survey
Driven and bored piles: why the same soil gives different capacity
What belongs on a borehole log, and what quietly gets left off
Drawing a cross section: correlating layers between boreholes
From an AGS4 file to a laboratory summary: what the groups carry
Characteristic values: turning a set of test results into one number
Void ratio, porosity and saturation from one density test
When one soil layer is really two: splitting geotechnical units
ASTM D4253 and D4254: maximum and minimum index density
Relative density Dr and density index Id are not the same number
USCS classification step by step: ASTM D2487
Cu and Cc: what the two gradation coefficients actually tell you
Dual symbols in USCS: the 5 to 12 percent fines band
EN ISO 14688-1 against USCS: two different size ladders
AGS4 file validation: what the rules actually check
AGS4 syntax: the five rules that break a delivery
ASTM D2435 oedometer test: from the curve to Cc, mv and Eoed
Converting oedometer modulus to Young’s modulus
EN ISO 17892-5 and ASTM D2435: where the two diverge
ASTM D1196 plate load test: modulus and subgrade reaction
DIN 18134: Ev1, Ev2 and the compaction ratio
Ménard pressuremeter modulus: ASTM D4719 and EN ISO 22476-4
Permeability from a pumping test: the Dupuit formulas
Shewhart control chart constants: A2, A3, B3, B4, D3, D4, d2, c4
The eight out of control tests on a Shewhart chart
Repeatability and reproducibility limits: where 2.77 comes from
How rebar cutting plans are optimised: the cutting stock problem
Cutting waste in rebar fabrication: what percentage is normal
Rebound hammer calibration: why the factory curve is not enough
Kerf and offcut: what a linear cutting plan has to account for
Earthwork volume from survey points: grid, TIN and cross sections
Fire load density: the formula, the calorific values and the traps
Explosive atmosphere zones 0, 1, 2 and 20, 21, 22 explained
Pollution charges per tonne: how the over-limit multiplier works
The Russian environmental fee: who pays, when, and how the advances work