Cu and Cc: what the two gradation coefficients actually tell you
Updated: 2026-08-04 · ISKRIT
Two numbers describe the shape of a grain size curve. Cu says how wide the range of sizes is, Cc says whether the curve is smooth across that range. Both are needed, and each alone is misleading.
Definitions
Cu = d60 / d10 is the coefficient of uniformity. It is the ratio
of the size that 60 % of the mass is finer than to the size that 10 % is finer
than. A uniform sand from a dune sits near 2. A glacial till can pass 100.
Cc = d30² / (d10 · d60) is the coefficient of curvature. It
compares the actual d30 with the value a smooth log-linear curve would have
between d10 and d60. Values near 1 mean smooth, values below 1 mean the middle
sizes are under-represented, values above 3 mean they dominate.
The thresholds
| Soil | Well graded when |
|---|---|
| Gravel (GW) | Cu ≥ 4 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3 |
| Sand (SW) | Cu ≥ 6 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3 |
Sand carries the higher uniformity threshold because a narrow gravel band still contains a broad absolute range of particle sizes, while a narrow sand band does not.
Why Cu alone fails
A gap-graded soil, coarse gravel poured onto fine sand with nothing in between, has an enormous Cu. Reading Cu alone would call it well graded, and it compacts badly, segregates during placement and gives an unreliable density. Cc catches exactly this case: with the middle sizes missing, d30 sits close to d10 and Cc drops well below 1.
The reverse failure is rarer but real. A soil with a pronounced middle bulge gives Cc above 3, meaning the curve is not smooth either, just bulged the other way.
A practical caution about d10
Cu and Cc both divide by d10, which is the least reliable point on most curves. It usually falls near or below the finest sieve, so it comes from extrapolation or from a hydrometer test with its own uncertainty. A 20 % error in d10 propagates straight into a 20 % error in Cu. When d10 lies below the finest sieve actually used, the honest report says the coefficients are indicative.
The coefficients are computed with the characteristic diameters in the grain size analysis tool.
ASTM D4253 and D4254: maximum and minimum index density
Relative density Dr and density index Id are not the same number
USCS classification step by step: ASTM D2487
Dual symbols in USCS: the 5 to 12 percent fines band
EN ISO 14688-1 against USCS: two different size ladders
AGS4 file validation: what the rules actually check
AGS4 syntax: the five rules that break a delivery
ASTM D2435 oedometer test: from the curve to Cc, mv and Eoed
Converting oedometer modulus to Young’s modulus
EN ISO 17892-5 and ASTM D2435: where the two diverge
ASTM D1196 plate load test: modulus and subgrade reaction
DIN 18134: Ev1, Ev2 and the compaction ratio
Ménard pressuremeter modulus: ASTM D4719 and EN ISO 22476-4
Shewhart control chart constants: A2, A3, B3, B4, D3, D4, d2, c4
The eight out of control tests on a Shewhart chart
Repeatability and reproducibility limits: where 2.77 comes from
How rebar cutting plans are optimised: the cutting stock problem
Cutting waste in rebar fabrication: what percentage is normal
Earthwork volume from survey points: grid, TIN and cross sections