ASTM D1196 plate load test: modulus and subgrade reaction
Updated: August 4, 2026 · ISKRIT
A plate load test loads a rigid circular plate in steps and records settlement. Two numbers come out of the same curve: an elastic modulus and a modulus of subgrade reaction, and they answer different design questions.
The formula
For a rigid circular plate on an elastic half-space:
E = (1 − ν²) · (π/4) · D · Δp / Δs
The π/4 factor, 0.7854, is the rigid-plate shape coefficient. D is the plate diameter and Δp/Δs is the slope of the linear portion of the pressure-settlement curve. ASTM D1196 applies no embedment correction, which is the practical difference from the Russian GOST 20276 procedure, where a tabulated coefficient accounts for testing at the bottom of a borehole and the shape factor is rounded to 0.79.
Modulus of subgrade reaction
The other result is simply the inverse slope:
k = Δp / Δs
It has units of stress per length and is what a Winkler foundation model consumes. It is not a soil property. It depends on plate size, on the depth of the influenced zone and therefore on the layering underneath, and a k measured on a 300 mm plate cannot be applied to a 3 m footing without a size correction.
Worked
A 300 mm plate on sand, ν = 0.30. Over the straight part of the curve a 0.2 MPa increment produces 0.12 cm of settlement, so Δs/Δp = 0.6 cm/MPa.
E = (1 − 0.09) · 0.7854 · 30 / 0.6 = 35.7 MPa
k = 1 / 0.6 = 1.67 MPa/cm = 167 MN/m³
Choosing the linear segment
Both results are slopes, so both hinge on which steps you call linear. The first step is usually excluded because it contains seating of the plate; the last steps are excluded once the curve bends into yielding. Reporting the pressure range used is therefore not optional, and a report that gives E without it cannot be audited.
Questions
Why does a bigger plate give a lower k? Because it stresses a deeper zone, and deeper material is usually less stiff than the compacted surface layer.
Is one loading cycle enough? For a modulus, yes; for compaction acceptance, no, and that is what the DIN two-cycle procedure exists for.
Enter the load steps and get E, k and the segment used in the plate load test calculator, part of the field testing tool.
Measurement uncertainty calculator: GUM budget with Type A, Type B and expanded U
Area from coordinates calculator: shoelace formula for survey plots
Bearing and distance from coordinates: survey inverse calculator
Rotating shift patterns: covering the posts and balancing the hours
Calibration intervals: setting them, shortening them, defending them
Turning an estimate into a bill of quantities that foots
Progress billing: percent complete, carry-forward and retention
Checking claimed quantities: the design schedule and the survey
Pile capacity from CPT: how the LCPC method reads a cone trace
Driven and bored piles: why the same soil gives different capacity
What belongs on a borehole log, and what quietly gets left off
Drawing a cross section: correlating layers between boreholes
From an AGS4 file to a laboratory summary: what the groups carry
Characteristic values: turning a set of test results into one number
Void ratio, porosity and saturation from one density test
When one soil layer is really two: splitting geotechnical units
ASTM D4254 minimum index density: procedure and Dr calculator
Relative density Dr and density index Id are not the same number
USCS classification step by step: ASTM D2487
Cu and Cc: what the two gradation coefficients actually tell you
Dual symbols in USCS: the 5 to 12 percent fines band
EN ISO 14688-1 against USCS: two different size ladders
AGS4 file validation: what the rules actually check
AGS4 syntax: the five rules that break a delivery
ASTM D2435 oedometer test: from the curve to Cc, mv and Eoed
Converting oedometer modulus to Young’s modulus
EN ISO 17892-5 and ASTM D2435: where the two diverge
DIN 18134: Ev1, Ev2 and the compaction ratio
Ménard pressuremeter modulus: ASTM D4719 and EN ISO 22476-4
Hydraulic conductivity from a pumping test: Dupuit calculator and formulas
Shewhart control chart constants: A2, A3, B3, B4, D3, D4, d2, c4
The eight out of control tests on a Shewhart chart
Repeatability and reproducibility limits: where 2.77 comes from
How rebar cutting plans are optimised: the cutting stock problem
Cutting waste in rebar fabrication: what percentage is normal
Rebound hammer calibration: why the factory curve is not enough
Kerf and offcut: what a linear cutting plan has to account for
Earthwork volume from survey points: grid, TIN and cross sections
Fire load density: the formula, the calorific values and the traps
Explosive atmosphere zones 0, 1, 2 and 20, 21, 22 explained
Pollution charges per tonne: how the over-limit multiplier works
The Russian environmental fee: who pays, when, and how the advances work