Driven and bored piles: why the same soil gives different capacity
Updated: 2026-08-13 · ISKRIT
Two piles of the same diameter, to the same depth, through the same soil. One is driven and one is bored, and their capacities can differ by half. The soil did not change; the installation changed the soil.
What driving does
A driven pile displaces its own volume of soil sideways. In sand that densifies a zone around the shaft and raises the horizontal stress against it, which raises shaft friction. In soft clay it remoulds the soil and generates excess pore pressure, so capacity immediately after driving is low and then recovers over weeks as the pressure dissipates. Testing a pile in clay the day after driving measures the wrong thing.
What boring does
A bored pile removes soil instead of displacing it. The ground around the hole relaxes toward it, horizontal stress falls, and shaft friction falls with it. Under bentonite or polymer slurry a filter cake forms on the wall, which reduces friction further unless the concrete placement scours it off. The toe is the more delicate part: debris left at the base of the hole sits between the concrete and the bearing stratum, and a toe resting on 100 mm of soft spoil carries a fraction of what the design assumed.
How the difference is expressed
| Term | Driven | Bored |
|---|---|---|
| Shaft friction in sand | raised by densification | reduced by relaxation |
| Shaft friction in clay | low at first, recovers with time | closer to the undisturbed value |
| Toe resistance | reliable, base is compacted by driving | depends entirely on base cleaning |
| Verification | driving records give a set per blow | no equivalent record, integrity testing needed |
The substitution that goes wrong
A contractor unable to drive on a noise-restricted site proposes bored piles of the same diameter and length. Taken as a like-for-like swap, the capacity is overstated: the shaft term falls in sand, and the toe term now depends on workmanship rather than on the hammer. The correct response is to recompute with the factors for the new installation, which usually means a longer or wider pile, and to add base cleaning and integrity testing to the specification.
Group effects sit on top
Neither pile type escapes group action. Piles at close spacing share a stress bulb, and the group carries less than the sum of its members. The efficiency depends on spacing, on the number of piles and on whether the cap bears on the soil, and it applies to driven and bored groups alike.
The pile bearing capacity calculator applies the factors for the chosen installation method and shows the shaft and toe contributions separately, so a change of pile type can be compared term by term.
Rotating shift patterns: covering the posts and balancing the hours
Calibration intervals: setting them, shortening them, defending them
Turning an estimate into a bill of quantities that foots
Progress billing: percent complete, carry-forward and retention
Checking claimed quantities: the design schedule and the survey
Pile capacity from CPT: how the LCPC method reads a cone trace
What belongs on a borehole log, and what quietly gets left off
Drawing a cross section: correlating layers between boreholes
From an AGS4 file to a laboratory summary: what the groups carry
Characteristic values: turning a set of test results into one number
Void ratio, porosity and saturation from one density test
When one soil layer is really two: splitting geotechnical units
ASTM D4253 and D4254: maximum and minimum index density
Relative density Dr and density index Id are not the same number
USCS classification step by step: ASTM D2487
Cu and Cc: what the two gradation coefficients actually tell you
Dual symbols in USCS: the 5 to 12 percent fines band
EN ISO 14688-1 against USCS: two different size ladders
AGS4 file validation: what the rules actually check
AGS4 syntax: the five rules that break a delivery
ASTM D2435 oedometer test: from the curve to Cc, mv and Eoed
Converting oedometer modulus to Young’s modulus
EN ISO 17892-5 and ASTM D2435: where the two diverge
ASTM D1196 plate load test: modulus and subgrade reaction
DIN 18134: Ev1, Ev2 and the compaction ratio
Ménard pressuremeter modulus: ASTM D4719 and EN ISO 22476-4
Permeability from a pumping test: the Dupuit formulas
Shewhart control chart constants: A2, A3, B3, B4, D3, D4, d2, c4
The eight out of control tests on a Shewhart chart
Repeatability and reproducibility limits: where 2.77 comes from
How rebar cutting plans are optimised: the cutting stock problem
Cutting waste in rebar fabrication: what percentage is normal
Rebound hammer calibration: why the factory curve is not enough
Kerf and offcut: what a linear cutting plan has to account for
Earthwork volume from survey points: grid, TIN and cross sections
Fire load density: the formula, the calorific values and the traps
Explosive atmosphere zones 0, 1, 2 and 20, 21, 22 explained
Pollution charges per tonne: how the over-limit multiplier works
The Russian environmental fee: who pays, when, and how the advances work