Void ratio, porosity and saturation from one density test
Updated: 2026-08-13 · ISKRIT
Bulk density, water content and particle density are three measurements. Everything else in the index table is arithmetic on those three, which is why one bad weighing propagates into eight reported values.
The three phases
A soil sample is solids, water and air. Dry density strips the water out of the bulk density:
ρd = ρ / (1 + w)
The void ratio compares the volume of the voids to the volume of the solids, and porosity compares voids to the total. They carry the same information in two forms:
e = ρs / ρd − 1 and n = e / (1 + e)
Degree of saturation is the fraction of the voids that holds water:
Sr = w · ρs / (e · ρw)
Worked through
Take ρ = 1.94 g/cm³, w = 0.22 and ρs = 2.70 g/cm³. Dry density is 1.94 / 1.22 = 1.59 g/cm³. Void ratio is 2.70 / 1.59 − 1 = 0.698. Porosity is 0.698 / 1.698 = 0.411, so 41 percent of the sample volume is void. Saturation is 0.22 · 2.70 / 0.698 = 0.851, or 85 percent.
When saturation comes out above 100 percent
It cannot. Sr above unity means one of the three inputs is wrong, and the arithmetic has just told you so. The usual causes, in order of how often they turn out to be the culprit: particle density assumed rather than measured, the sample dried at the wrong temperature so the water content is overstated, or the cutting ring not full so the bulk density is understated.
This is the most useful check in the whole index table, because it is the only one that is self-validating. Treat a saturation of 104 percent as a laboratory finding, not as a rounding artefact to be quietly clipped to 100.
What the result is most sensitive to
| Input | Change | Effect on e |
|---|---|---|
| Bulk density | +1 % | about −1.6 % |
| Water content | +1 % absolute | about +1.4 % |
| Particle density | 2.65 to 2.70 | about +3 % |
Particle density is the one most often taken from a table rather than measured, and it is the one that moves the answer most. For a soil with organic content or heavy minerals, the tabulated 2.65 can be out by more than the whole measurement error of the other two inputs combined.
The soil index properties calculator computes the full three-phase set from the three measurements, flags a saturation above unity as an input error rather than clipping it, and returns the USCS group symbol from the same data.
Rotating shift patterns: covering the posts and balancing the hours
Calibration intervals: setting them, shortening them, defending them
Turning an estimate into a bill of quantities that foots
Progress billing: percent complete, carry-forward and retention
Checking claimed quantities: the design schedule and the survey
Pile capacity from CPT: how the LCPC method reads a cone trace
Driven and bored piles: why the same soil gives different capacity
What belongs on a borehole log, and what quietly gets left off
Drawing a cross section: correlating layers between boreholes
From an AGS4 file to a laboratory summary: what the groups carry
Characteristic values: turning a set of test results into one number
When one soil layer is really two: splitting geotechnical units
ASTM D4253 and D4254: maximum and minimum index density
Relative density Dr and density index Id are not the same number
USCS classification step by step: ASTM D2487
Cu and Cc: what the two gradation coefficients actually tell you
Dual symbols in USCS: the 5 to 12 percent fines band
EN ISO 14688-1 against USCS: two different size ladders
AGS4 file validation: what the rules actually check
AGS4 syntax: the five rules that break a delivery
ASTM D2435 oedometer test: from the curve to Cc, mv and Eoed
Converting oedometer modulus to Young’s modulus
EN ISO 17892-5 and ASTM D2435: where the two diverge
ASTM D1196 plate load test: modulus and subgrade reaction
DIN 18134: Ev1, Ev2 and the compaction ratio
Ménard pressuremeter modulus: ASTM D4719 and EN ISO 22476-4
Permeability from a pumping test: the Dupuit formulas
Shewhart control chart constants: A2, A3, B3, B4, D3, D4, d2, c4
The eight out of control tests on a Shewhart chart
Repeatability and reproducibility limits: where 2.77 comes from
How rebar cutting plans are optimised: the cutting stock problem
Cutting waste in rebar fabrication: what percentage is normal
Rebound hammer calibration: why the factory curve is not enough
Kerf and offcut: what a linear cutting plan has to account for
Earthwork volume from survey points: grid, TIN and cross sections
Fire load density: the formula, the calorific values and the traps
Explosive atmosphere zones 0, 1, 2 and 20, 21, 22 explained
Pollution charges per tonne: how the over-limit multiplier works
The Russian environmental fee: who pays, when, and how the advances work