ISKRIT / engineering reference ← to reference

ASTM D2435 oedometer test: from the curve to Cc, mv and Eoed

Updated: August 4, 2026 · ISKRIT

A one-dimensional consolidation test produces a single curve of void ratio against applied stress. Everything a designer takes from the test is a slope of that curve, read either on a logarithmic or on a linear pressure axis, and the choice of axis is what separates the reporting traditions.

The logarithmic reading

ASTM D2435 and EN ISO 17892-5 report the compression index:

Cc = (e1 − e2) / lg(p2 / p1)

It is dimensionless and roughly constant along the normally consolidated part of the curve, which is what makes it useful for settlement prediction over a wide stress range. It is also undefined when p1 is zero, since the logarithm of the ratio is not defined, so the first loading step from an unloaded state never yields a Cc.

The linear reading

Over a narrow stress interval the curve is close to straight and three linear quantities are used:

m0 = (e1 − e2) / (p2 − p1), the coefficient of compressibility;
mv = m0 / (1 + e0), the coefficient of volume compressibility;
Eoed = (1 + e0) / m0, the oedometer modulus, which is simply 1/mv.

These depend on the interval chosen, so an Eoed quoted without its stress range is meaningless. Reports that give a modulus of 6 MPa for a soft clay without saying over which two pressure steps it was read cannot be checked or reused.

Worked example

Initial void ratio e0 = 0.72. On the interval from 0.1 to 0.2 MPa the curve gives e1 = 0.700 and e2 = 0.672.

QuantityValue
m00.28 MPa⁻¹
mv0.163 MPa⁻¹
Eoed6.14 MPa
Cc0.093

The Cc looks small because the interval sits in the recompression range, below the preconsolidation stress. Read across a decade of stress above that point, the same soil would give a Cc several times larger. Mixing the two regions in one average is the most common source of underestimated settlement.

Questions

Is Eoed the same as Young's modulus? No. Lateral strain is prevented in an oedometer, so Eoed is stiffer than E and needs a Poisson correction to be converted.

How many steps should the curve have? Enough that the interval of interest is bracketed by measured points rather than interpolated across a wide gap; loading is normally doubled each step.

Enter the curve step by step and get m0, mv, Eoed and Cc in the consolidation and shear tool.

More in the reference:
Measurement uncertainty calculator: GUM budget with Type A, Type B and expanded U
Area from coordinates calculator: shoelace formula for survey plots
Bearing and distance from coordinates: survey inverse calculator
Rotating shift patterns: covering the posts and balancing the hours
Calibration intervals: setting them, shortening them, defending them
Turning an estimate into a bill of quantities that foots
Progress billing: percent complete, carry-forward and retention
Checking claimed quantities: the design schedule and the survey
Pile capacity from CPT: how the LCPC method reads a cone trace
Driven and bored piles: why the same soil gives different capacity
What belongs on a borehole log, and what quietly gets left off
Drawing a cross section: correlating layers between boreholes
From an AGS4 file to a laboratory summary: what the groups carry
Characteristic values: turning a set of test results into one number
Void ratio, porosity and saturation from one density test
When one soil layer is really two: splitting geotechnical units
ASTM D4254 minimum index density: procedure and Dr calculator
Relative density Dr and density index Id are not the same number
USCS classification step by step: ASTM D2487
Cu and Cc: what the two gradation coefficients actually tell you
Dual symbols in USCS: the 5 to 12 percent fines band
EN ISO 14688-1 against USCS: two different size ladders
AGS4 file validation: what the rules actually check
AGS4 syntax: the five rules that break a delivery
Converting oedometer modulus to Young’s modulus
EN ISO 17892-5 and ASTM D2435: where the two diverge
ASTM D1196 plate load test: modulus and subgrade reaction
DIN 18134: Ev1, Ev2 and the compaction ratio
Ménard pressuremeter modulus: ASTM D4719 and EN ISO 22476-4
Hydraulic conductivity from a pumping test: Dupuit calculator and formulas
Shewhart control chart constants: A2, A3, B3, B4, D3, D4, d2, c4
The eight out of control tests on a Shewhart chart
Repeatability and reproducibility limits: where 2.77 comes from
How rebar cutting plans are optimised: the cutting stock problem
Cutting waste in rebar fabrication: what percentage is normal
Rebound hammer calibration: why the factory curve is not enough
Kerf and offcut: what a linear cutting plan has to account for
Earthwork volume from survey points: grid, TIN and cross sections
Fire load density: the formula, the calorific values and the traps
Explosive atmosphere zones 0, 1, 2 and 20, 21, 22 explained
Pollution charges per tonne: how the over-limit multiplier works
The Russian environmental fee: who pays, when, and how the advances work