Characteristic values: turning a set of test results into one number
Updated: 2026-08-13 · ISKRIT
A design calculation takes one friction angle. The laboratory returns eleven. Everything between those two facts is a statistical procedure, and the number that comes out depends as much on the scatter as on the mean.
How many determinations
The minimum count is not a formality. With six results the confidence interval on a mean is wide enough that the characteristic value sits far below the mean; with twenty it tightens considerably. Practice codes set a floor of six determinations for strength and deformation properties and ten for physical properties, on the reasoning that physical tests are cheap and their scatter is what defines the unit in the first place.
Rejecting an outlier
An outlier is not a value you dislike. It is a value whose distance from the mean exceeds a threshold that depends on the sample size, and the test is applied once per pass: reject the worst offender, recompute the mean and the standard deviation, then test again. Rejecting several at once on the first statistics is a common error, and it removes results that would have passed after the first rejection changed the mean.
Every rejection has to leave a trace. A report that says "eleven tests" when two were discarded is not reproducible, and the reviewer cannot tell a genuine outlier from an inconvenient one.
Why the coefficient of variation matters more than the mean
The coefficient of variation V is the standard deviation over the mean. It is the number that decides whether the set describes one soil or two. Take two units with the same mean friction angle of 24 degrees: one with V = 0.08 and one with V = 0.28. The first gives a characteristic value close to 23 degrees, the second closer to 19. Same mean, four degrees apart in design, because the second set is not one population.
| What V is telling you | Typical reading |
|---|---|
| V small, results tight | the unit is real and sampling was consistent |
| V large for a physical property | the unit is probably two units that need splitting |
| V large for a strength property | could be genuine variability, could be test technique |
| V large and results bimodal | look at depth and location before touching the statistics |
Two design values, not one
Strength properties are taken at a higher confidence than deformation properties, because a strength failure is brittle and a settlement error is not. The same set of test results therefore yields two different characteristic values depending on what the number will be used for, and quoting a single "design value" without saying which one it is invites the reader to use it in the wrong calculation.
The soil statistics calculator runs the rejection pass by pass, reports the coefficient of variation with the mean, and returns both confidence levels side by side with the rejection log.
Rotating shift patterns: covering the posts and balancing the hours
Calibration intervals: setting them, shortening them, defending them
Turning an estimate into a bill of quantities that foots
Progress billing: percent complete, carry-forward and retention
Checking claimed quantities: the design schedule and the survey
Pile capacity from CPT: how the LCPC method reads a cone trace
Driven and bored piles: why the same soil gives different capacity
What belongs on a borehole log, and what quietly gets left off
Drawing a cross section: correlating layers between boreholes
From an AGS4 file to a laboratory summary: what the groups carry
Void ratio, porosity and saturation from one density test
When one soil layer is really two: splitting geotechnical units
ASTM D4253 and D4254: maximum and minimum index density
Relative density Dr and density index Id are not the same number
USCS classification step by step: ASTM D2487
Cu and Cc: what the two gradation coefficients actually tell you
Dual symbols in USCS: the 5 to 12 percent fines band
EN ISO 14688-1 against USCS: two different size ladders
AGS4 file validation: what the rules actually check
AGS4 syntax: the five rules that break a delivery
ASTM D2435 oedometer test: from the curve to Cc, mv and Eoed
Converting oedometer modulus to Young’s modulus
EN ISO 17892-5 and ASTM D2435: where the two diverge
ASTM D1196 plate load test: modulus and subgrade reaction
DIN 18134: Ev1, Ev2 and the compaction ratio
Ménard pressuremeter modulus: ASTM D4719 and EN ISO 22476-4
Permeability from a pumping test: the Dupuit formulas
Shewhart control chart constants: A2, A3, B3, B4, D3, D4, d2, c4
The eight out of control tests on a Shewhart chart
Repeatability and reproducibility limits: where 2.77 comes from
How rebar cutting plans are optimised: the cutting stock problem
Cutting waste in rebar fabrication: what percentage is normal
Rebound hammer calibration: why the factory curve is not enough
Kerf and offcut: what a linear cutting plan has to account for
Earthwork volume from survey points: grid, TIN and cross sections
Fire load density: the formula, the calorific values and the traps
Explosive atmosphere zones 0, 1, 2 and 20, 21, 22 explained
Pollution charges per tonne: how the over-limit multiplier works
The Russian environmental fee: who pays, when, and how the advances work