DIN 18134: Ev1, Ev2 and the compaction ratio
Updated: September 30, 2026 · ISKRIT
DIN 18134 does not report an elastic modulus in the usual sense. It loads the plate twice, fits a parabola to each cycle, takes the tangent at maximum stress, and uses the ratio of the two deformation moduli as the acceptance criterion for compaction.
The fit
Each loading cycle gives a settlement curve, fitted as a second-order polynomial in the applied stress:
s = a0 + a1·σ + a2·σ²
The deformation modulus is taken from the tangent at the maximum stress reached in that cycle:
Ev = 1.5 · r / (a1 + a2·σmax)
where r is the plate radius. Because it is a tangent and not a secant, Ev depends on the peak stress applied, which is why the standard fixes the loading schedule rather than leaving it to the operator.
Why two cycles
The first cycle contains both recoverable and permanent deformation. The second, run on ground already compacted by the first, is mostly recoverable. Their ratio therefore measures how much irrecoverable settlement was left in the layer, which is exactly what compaction acceptance is about. Well compacted material barely deforms plastically on the first cycle, so the two moduli come out close and the ratio is low.
Worked
A 300 mm plate, r = 150 mm. The first cycle fit gives a1 = 2.5 and a2 = 1.0 in mm per MN/m², with a maximum stress of 0.5 MN/m²:
Ev1 = 1.5 · 150 / (2.5 + 1.0 · 0.5) = 75 MN/m²
Second cycle, a1 = 1.2 and a2 = 0.4:
Ev2 = 1.5 · 150 / (1.2 + 0.4 · 0.5) = 161 MN/m²
Ev2 / Ev1 = 2.14
Specifications commonly cap the ratio at 2.2 for subbase layers, so this layer passes, and it passes on the ratio rather than on Ev2 alone.
What the ratio does not tell you
A layer can show a low ratio and still be under-compacted if it is uniformly soft: both cycles are then equally poor and their ratio looks respectable. That is why specifications set a minimum Ev2 as well as a maximum ratio, and why both criteria must be quoted when results are reported.
Questions
How is Ev calculated in DIN 18134? Each loading cycle is fitted with s = a0 + a1·σ + a2·σ², and the modulus is the tangent at the maximum stress: Ev = 1.5 · r / (a1 + a2·σmax), where r is the plate radius.
What does the Ev2 / Ev1 ratio show? How much irrecoverable settlement the first cycle left in the layer. Well compacted material deforms little on the first cycle, so the two moduli are close and the ratio is low; specifications commonly cap it at 2.2 for subbase layers.
Can a low ratio still mean poor compaction? Yes. A uniformly soft layer gives low moduli on both cycles and a low ratio, so the ratio is read together with Ev2.
The plate load test calculator fits both cycles, returns Ev1, Ev2 and the ratio, and keeps the polynomial coefficients so the fit can be checked.
Measurement uncertainty calculator: GUM budget with Type A, Type B and expanded U
Area from coordinates calculator: shoelace formula for survey plots
Bearing and distance from coordinates: survey inverse calculator
Rotating shift patterns: covering the posts and balancing the hours
Calibration intervals: setting them, shortening them, defending them
Turning an estimate into a bill of quantities that foots
Progress billing: percent complete, carry-forward and retention
Checking claimed quantities: the design schedule and the survey
Pile capacity from CPT: how the LCPC method reads a cone trace
Driven and bored piles: why the same soil gives different capacity
What belongs on a borehole log, and what quietly gets left off
Drawing a cross section: correlating layers between boreholes
From an AGS4 file to a laboratory summary: what the groups carry
Characteristic values: turning a set of test results into one number
Void ratio, porosity and saturation from one density test
When one soil layer is really two: splitting geotechnical units
ASTM D4254 minimum index density: procedure and Dr calculator
Relative density Dr and density index Id are not the same number
USCS classification step by step: ASTM D2487
Cu and Cc: what the two gradation coefficients actually tell you
Dual symbols in USCS: the 5 to 12 percent fines band
EN ISO 14688-1 against USCS: two different size ladders
AGS4 file validation: what the rules actually check
AGS4 syntax: the five rules that break a delivery
ASTM D2435 oedometer test: from the curve to Cc, mv and Eoed
Converting oedometer modulus to Young’s modulus
EN ISO 17892-5 and ASTM D2435: where the two diverge
ASTM D1196 plate load test: modulus and subgrade reaction
Ménard pressuremeter modulus: ASTM D4719 and EN ISO 22476-4
Hydraulic conductivity from a pumping test: Dupuit calculator and formulas
Shewhart control chart constants: A2, A3, B3, B4, D3, D4, d2, c4
The eight out of control tests on a Shewhart chart
Repeatability and reproducibility limits: where 2.77 comes from
How rebar cutting plans are optimised: the cutting stock problem
Cutting waste in rebar fabrication: what percentage is normal
Rebound hammer calibration: why the factory curve is not enough
Kerf and offcut: what a linear cutting plan has to account for
Earthwork volume from survey points: grid, TIN and cross sections
Fire load density: the formula, the calorific values and the traps
Explosive atmosphere zones 0, 1, 2 and 20, 21, 22 explained
Pollution charges per tonne: how the over-limit multiplier works
The Russian environmental fee: who pays, when, and how the advances work