ISKRIT / engineering reference ← to reference

Kerf and offcut: what a linear cutting plan has to account for

Updated: 2026-08-13 · ISKRIT

A linear cutting plan that ignores the blade is short by one part on every long bar. Kerf, end trim and the remnant threshold are the three settings that separate an arithmetic exercise from a plan the saw can run.

Kerf

Kerf is the width of material the cut destroys. It is a property of the machine, not of the bar: an abrasive chop saw takes 2.5 to 3.5 mm, a band saw 1.3 to 2.0 mm, a cold saw around 2.5 mm, a plasma torch 3 to 5 mm, and a hydraulic rebar shear takes nothing at all because it displaces steel instead of removing it.

The arithmetic is unforgiving. Cutting 12 pieces of 990 mm from a 12 000 mm bar looks like a perfect fit: 12 × 990 = 11 880 mm, 120 mm to spare. Add a 3 mm kerf and the eleven internal cuts consume 33 mm, which still fits. Ask for 12 pieces of 1000 mm and the same bar yields eleven, not twelve, because 11 × 1000 + 11 × 3 = 11 033 mm leaves 967 mm, short of a full part. One millimetre of assumed kerf, multiplied across a schedule, is the difference between ordering 100 bars and ordering 102.

End trim

Mill lengths arrive with damaged, out-of-square or painted ends. A trim allowance removes a fixed amount from one or both ends before any part is placed. Trim is not kerf: it applies once per stock length rather than once per cut, and it applies even when the plan makes a single cut.

Trim and kerf are often confused in spreadsheets, and the confusion is asymmetric. Treating trim as kerf understates consumption on bars with few cuts; treating kerf as trim understates it on bars with many.

Remnant threshold

What is left at the end of a stock length is either inventory or scrap, and the boundary is a business decision rather than a calculation. Two numbers define it: the shortest remnant worth racking, and the longest piece not worth handling. Below the lower bound the drop goes to the skip. Above the upper bound it returns to stock and reappears as an input on the next job.

Set the threshold at 1000 mm and a plan optimised purely for yield will happily leave twenty 800 mm drops that all become scrap. Set it at 300 mm and the rack fills with pieces nobody will ever pull. The threshold belongs in the plan, not in a note beside it, because the optimiser can trade a slightly worse yield for remnants that clear the bar.

What to check before ordering

SettingQuestionEffect if wrong
KerfWhich machine actually makes the cut?plan short by one part per bar
TrimAre the mill ends usable?first part on each bar undersized
Stock lengthsWhich lengths does the supplier really hold?plan cannot be bought
Remnant thresholdWhat length is worth racking?yield figure counts scrap as inventory

The linear cutting optimizer takes all four as explicit inputs and reports reusable remnant separately from scrap, so the yield figure means the same thing to the buyer and to the saw operator.

More in the reference:
Rotating shift patterns: covering the posts and balancing the hours
Calibration intervals: setting them, shortening them, defending them
Turning an estimate into a bill of quantities that foots
Progress billing: percent complete, carry-forward and retention
Checking claimed quantities: the design schedule and the survey
Pile capacity from CPT: how the LCPC method reads a cone trace
Driven and bored piles: why the same soil gives different capacity
What belongs on a borehole log, and what quietly gets left off
Drawing a cross section: correlating layers between boreholes
From an AGS4 file to a laboratory summary: what the groups carry
Characteristic values: turning a set of test results into one number
Void ratio, porosity and saturation from one density test
When one soil layer is really two: splitting geotechnical units
ASTM D4253 and D4254: maximum and minimum index density
Relative density Dr and density index Id are not the same number
USCS classification step by step: ASTM D2487
Cu and Cc: what the two gradation coefficients actually tell you
Dual symbols in USCS: the 5 to 12 percent fines band
EN ISO 14688-1 against USCS: two different size ladders
AGS4 file validation: what the rules actually check
AGS4 syntax: the five rules that break a delivery
ASTM D2435 oedometer test: from the curve to Cc, mv and Eoed
Converting oedometer modulus to Young’s modulus
EN ISO 17892-5 and ASTM D2435: where the two diverge
ASTM D1196 plate load test: modulus and subgrade reaction
DIN 18134: Ev1, Ev2 and the compaction ratio
Ménard pressuremeter modulus: ASTM D4719 and EN ISO 22476-4
Permeability from a pumping test: the Dupuit formulas
Shewhart control chart constants: A2, A3, B3, B4, D3, D4, d2, c4
The eight out of control tests on a Shewhart chart
Repeatability and reproducibility limits: where 2.77 comes from
How rebar cutting plans are optimised: the cutting stock problem
Cutting waste in rebar fabrication: what percentage is normal
Rebound hammer calibration: why the factory curve is not enough
Earthwork volume from survey points: grid, TIN and cross sections
Fire load density: the formula, the calorific values and the traps
Explosive atmosphere zones 0, 1, 2 and 20, 21, 22 explained
Pollution charges per tonne: how the over-limit multiplier works
The Russian environmental fee: who pays, when, and how the advances work