ISKRIT / engineering reference ← to reference

Drawing a cross section: correlating layers between boreholes

Updated: 2026-08-13 · ISKRIT

Boreholes are points. A cross section is a surface drawn through them, and everything between the boreholes is interpretation. The drawing rarely says which parts are measured and which are inferred, and that is where it misleads.

Matching layers

Correlation is done on origin and description first, not on depth. Two sand layers at similar elevation in adjacent holes may be the same deposit or may be a channel fill cutting through an older bed. The evidence for the match comes from the material itself: grading, colour, inclusions, the sequence above and below. Depth alone matches layers that have nothing to do with each other.

What the spacing allows

Spacing between holesWhat a straight line between them means
10 to 20 mreasonable in uniform deposits
30 to 50 mplausible, but a lens between them is undetectable
over 100 man assumption; label it as such
across a known geological boundarydo not connect at all

A pinch-out, a channel, a buried surface and a fault all live comfortably between two holes 60 m apart, and all four are invisible on the section that joins them with a ruler.

Vertical exaggeration

Sections are almost always stretched vertically, often ten times, because otherwise the layers are lines. The exaggeration makes gentle slopes look like scarps, and readers who miss the scale note plan foundations around a slope that does not exist. Two habits help: state the exaggeration on the drawing in words rather than only as a ratio, and keep it the same across every section in a report so sections can be compared.

The water surface is not a layer

A water table drawn as a continuous line across the section suggests it was measured continuously. It was measured in each hole, on a date, sometimes on different dates. Where holes were logged weeks apart, the line joins readings from different seasons. The dates belong on the section next to the levels.

What to show as uncertain

The useful convention is simple: solid where a boundary is proved by a log, dashed where it is inferred, absent where there is no evidence. A section drawn entirely in solid lines claims more than the investigation supports, and the reviewer has no way to see which claims are weak.

The cross section tool draws inferred boundaries differently from logged ones, carries the water level with its reading date, and prints the vertical exaggeration on the drawing.

More in the reference:
Rotating shift patterns: covering the posts and balancing the hours
Calibration intervals: setting them, shortening them, defending them
Turning an estimate into a bill of quantities that foots
Progress billing: percent complete, carry-forward and retention
Checking claimed quantities: the design schedule and the survey
Pile capacity from CPT: how the LCPC method reads a cone trace
Driven and bored piles: why the same soil gives different capacity
What belongs on a borehole log, and what quietly gets left off
From an AGS4 file to a laboratory summary: what the groups carry
Characteristic values: turning a set of test results into one number
Void ratio, porosity and saturation from one density test
When one soil layer is really two: splitting geotechnical units
ASTM D4253 and D4254: maximum and minimum index density
Relative density Dr and density index Id are not the same number
USCS classification step by step: ASTM D2487
Cu and Cc: what the two gradation coefficients actually tell you
Dual symbols in USCS: the 5 to 12 percent fines band
EN ISO 14688-1 against USCS: two different size ladders
AGS4 file validation: what the rules actually check
AGS4 syntax: the five rules that break a delivery
ASTM D2435 oedometer test: from the curve to Cc, mv and Eoed
Converting oedometer modulus to Young’s modulus
EN ISO 17892-5 and ASTM D2435: where the two diverge
ASTM D1196 plate load test: modulus and subgrade reaction
DIN 18134: Ev1, Ev2 and the compaction ratio
Ménard pressuremeter modulus: ASTM D4719 and EN ISO 22476-4
Permeability from a pumping test: the Dupuit formulas
Shewhart control chart constants: A2, A3, B3, B4, D3, D4, d2, c4
The eight out of control tests on a Shewhart chart
Repeatability and reproducibility limits: where 2.77 comes from
How rebar cutting plans are optimised: the cutting stock problem
Cutting waste in rebar fabrication: what percentage is normal
Rebound hammer calibration: why the factory curve is not enough
Kerf and offcut: what a linear cutting plan has to account for
Earthwork volume from survey points: grid, TIN and cross sections
Fire load density: the formula, the calorific values and the traps
Explosive atmosphere zones 0, 1, 2 and 20, 21, 22 explained
Pollution charges per tonne: how the over-limit multiplier works
The Russian environmental fee: who pays, when, and how the advances work