Turning an estimate into a bill of quantities that foots
Updated: 2026-08-13 · ISKRIT
The schedule you bill against and the estimate you priced are the same list of work seen twice. When they are typed separately, they drift, and the first person to notice is the one rejecting your application for payment.
Built, not retyped
An estimate already contains every item, its quantity, its unit and its value. A schedule built from those lines sums to the contract by construction: there is no arithmetic to get wrong, because the total was never recomputed. A schedule retyped into a blank grid has to be reconciled by hand every time the contract changes, and it usually is not.
The three things that break in the retyping
| Problem | How it shows up |
|---|---|
| Units not normalised | the same work billed in m² on one line and m³ on another |
| Duplicate items | the same scope priced twice under two descriptions |
| Rounding per line | the schedule total misses the contract sum by a few hundred |
The rounding case is the one that causes the most argument for the least money. Values rounded to whole currency units on 180 lines can leave the total short, and a reviewer who checks the sum before the substance stops there.
Grouping
Items are grouped the way the work is run and inspected, not the way the estimate happened to be assembled. Grouping by section or by structure lets a reviewer walk the site and tick lines in order; grouping by supplier or by the order the estimator thought of them does not. The grouping is also what makes partial certification possible, since an owner can certify a completed section while another is still in dispute.
The check before anything is billed
One arithmetic test catches most rejected applications: does the schedule sum to the contract sum, including approved variations. If it does not, no percentage complete is worth computing yet. Running that check automatically, and refusing to issue the certificate until it passes, removes the single most common reason for a rejected draw.
Variations belong in the schedule
An approved variation that is billed as a separate invoice sits outside the schedule, so the schedule no longer describes the contract and the running totals no longer reconcile. Adding the variation as lines in the schedule and adjusting the contract sum keeps one document as the record of what was agreed.
The bill of quantities generator builds the schedule from estimate lines with units normalised and duplicates merged, and the work completion certificate tool checks the schedule against the contract sum before it issues anything.
Rotating shift patterns: covering the posts and balancing the hours
Calibration intervals: setting them, shortening them, defending them
Progress billing: percent complete, carry-forward and retention
Checking claimed quantities: the design schedule and the survey
Pile capacity from CPT: how the LCPC method reads a cone trace
Driven and bored piles: why the same soil gives different capacity
What belongs on a borehole log, and what quietly gets left off
Drawing a cross section: correlating layers between boreholes
From an AGS4 file to a laboratory summary: what the groups carry
Characteristic values: turning a set of test results into one number
Void ratio, porosity and saturation from one density test
When one soil layer is really two: splitting geotechnical units
ASTM D4253 and D4254: maximum and minimum index density
Relative density Dr and density index Id are not the same number
USCS classification step by step: ASTM D2487
Cu and Cc: what the two gradation coefficients actually tell you
Dual symbols in USCS: the 5 to 12 percent fines band
EN ISO 14688-1 against USCS: two different size ladders
AGS4 file validation: what the rules actually check
AGS4 syntax: the five rules that break a delivery
ASTM D2435 oedometer test: from the curve to Cc, mv and Eoed
Converting oedometer modulus to Young’s modulus
EN ISO 17892-5 and ASTM D2435: where the two diverge
ASTM D1196 plate load test: modulus and subgrade reaction
DIN 18134: Ev1, Ev2 and the compaction ratio
Ménard pressuremeter modulus: ASTM D4719 and EN ISO 22476-4
Permeability from a pumping test: the Dupuit formulas
Shewhart control chart constants: A2, A3, B3, B4, D3, D4, d2, c4
The eight out of control tests on a Shewhart chart
Repeatability and reproducibility limits: where 2.77 comes from
How rebar cutting plans are optimised: the cutting stock problem
Cutting waste in rebar fabrication: what percentage is normal
Rebound hammer calibration: why the factory curve is not enough
Kerf and offcut: what a linear cutting plan has to account for
Earthwork volume from survey points: grid, TIN and cross sections
Fire load density: the formula, the calorific values and the traps
Explosive atmosphere zones 0, 1, 2 and 20, 21, 22 explained
Pollution charges per tonne: how the over-limit multiplier works
The Russian environmental fee: who pays, when, and how the advances work