Relative density Dr and density index Id are not the same number
Updated: September 15, 2026 · ISKRIT
Dr and Id are routinely treated as synonyms. They are not. One is defined on void ratios, the other on densities, and Dr is always the larger of the two.
The two definitions
Relative density works on void ratios:
Dr = (e max − e) / (e max − e min)
Density index works linearly on dry densities:
Id = (ρd − ρd min) / (ρd max − ρd min)
Substituting e = ρs/ρd − 1 into the first expression collapses the particle density out of it and leaves:
Dr = Id · ρd max / ρd
Since ρd max is by construction at least ρd, the ratio is at least one and Dr ≥ Id always holds. Equality only occurs when the soil is already at its maximum index density.
Calculator
Both definitions side by side from the same three densities.
How large is the gap
The multiplier is ρd max/ρd, so the difference grows as the soil gets looser. At Id = 0.30 with ρd max/ρd = 1.15 the relative density is 0.345, four and a half points higher. In the medium-dense band a five-point shift can move a result across the 65 % line that separates “medium dense” from “dense”, and that line is what acceptance criteria are written against.
Which one does the specification mean
ASTM D4254 defines both terms explicitly and separately: relative density in clause 3.2.9, density index in 3.2.8. EN ISO 14688-2 uses “density index ID” for what ASTM calls relative density, on void ratios. Russian GOST 25100 uses the symbol ID for the same void-ratio quantity. So the symbol travels between standards attached to different formulas, and reading the symbol alone is not enough.
The practical rule: if the document defines the quantity through e max and e min, it wants the void-ratio form regardless of which letter it prints.
Questions
Why does the linear form exist at all? It needs only three densities and no particle density measurement, which makes it cheap for field control.
Can I convert an old Id report to Dr? Yes, if the report also gives the in-place dry density and the maximum index density, since the conversion factor is just their ratio.
Both quantities are reported side by side, from the same input, in the relative density calculator.
Measurement uncertainty calculator: GUM budget with Type A, Type B and expanded U
Area from coordinates calculator: shoelace formula for survey plots
Bearing and distance from coordinates: survey inverse calculator
Rotating shift patterns: covering the posts and balancing the hours
Calibration intervals: setting them, shortening them, defending them
Turning an estimate into a bill of quantities that foots
Progress billing: percent complete, carry-forward and retention
Checking claimed quantities: the design schedule and the survey
Pile capacity from CPT: how the LCPC method reads a cone trace
Driven and bored piles: why the same soil gives different capacity
What belongs on a borehole log, and what quietly gets left off
Drawing a cross section: correlating layers between boreholes
From an AGS4 file to a laboratory summary: what the groups carry
Characteristic values: turning a set of test results into one number
Void ratio, porosity and saturation from one density test
When one soil layer is really two: splitting geotechnical units
ASTM D4254 minimum index density: procedure and Dr calculator
USCS classification step by step: ASTM D2487
Cu and Cc: what the two gradation coefficients actually tell you
Dual symbols in USCS: the 5 to 12 percent fines band
EN ISO 14688-1 against USCS: two different size ladders
AGS4 file validation: what the rules actually check
AGS4 syntax: the five rules that break a delivery
ASTM D2435 oedometer test: from the curve to Cc, mv and Eoed
Converting oedometer modulus to Young’s modulus
EN ISO 17892-5 and ASTM D2435: where the two diverge
ASTM D1196 plate load test: modulus and subgrade reaction
DIN 18134: Ev1, Ev2 and the compaction ratio
Ménard pressuremeter modulus: ASTM D4719 and EN ISO 22476-4
Hydraulic conductivity from a pumping test: Dupuit calculator and formulas
Shewhart control chart constants: A2, A3, B3, B4, D3, D4, d2, c4
The eight out of control tests on a Shewhart chart
Repeatability and reproducibility limits: where 2.77 comes from
How rebar cutting plans are optimised: the cutting stock problem
Cutting waste in rebar fabrication: what percentage is normal
Rebound hammer calibration: why the factory curve is not enough
Kerf and offcut: what a linear cutting plan has to account for
Earthwork volume from survey points: grid, TIN and cross sections
Fire load density: the formula, the calorific values and the traps
Explosive atmosphere zones 0, 1, 2 and 20, 21, 22 explained
Pollution charges per tonne: how the over-limit multiplier works
The Russian environmental fee: who pays, when, and how the advances work