Measurement uncertainty calculator: GUM budget with Type A, Type B and expanded U
Updated: September 30, 2026 · ISKRIT
Measurement uncertainty is the parameter that describes the spread of values that can reasonably be attributed to the measured quantity. Under the GUM (ISO/IEC Guide 98-3) it is estimated in four steps: standard uncertainties from Type A and Type B evaluations, their root-sum-square combination into uc, and multiplication by a coverage factor k, usually 2, to give the expanded uncertainty U at about 95 % coverage.
Calculator
Type A and Type B
Type A is evaluated statistically from repeated readings: the standard uncertainty of the mean is uA = s/√n with n - 1 degrees of freedom.
Type B covers everything else: the instrument specification, the calibration certificate of the reference, the resolution, handbook data. A limit is turned into a standard uncertainty through the assumed distribution:
| Source | Distribution | Standard uncertainty |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum permissible error ±a | rectangular | a / √3 |
| Expanded uncertainty U from a certificate at k = 2 | normal | U / 2 |
| Resolution d of a digital display | rectangular over ±d/2 | d / (2√3) |
| Limit ±a with values near the centre more likely | triangular | a / √6 |
Combined and expanded uncertainty
Combined. For uncorrelated contributions with unit sensitivity coefficients, uc = √(uA² + uB1² + uB2² + ...). The largest contribution usually dominates, so that is the one worth reducing.
Expanded. U = k · uc. With k = 2 the interval result ± U covers about 95 % of the values. When Type A dominates and there are few readings, k is taken from the Student distribution at the effective degrees of freedom.
Effective degrees of freedom. The Welch-Satterthwaite formula gives νeff = uc⁴ / Σ(ui⁴ / νi). Type B contributions are usually taken with infinite degrees of freedom, which leaves νeff = uc⁴ / (uA⁴ / (n - 1)).
Worked example
Five readings: 10.2, 10.5, 10.1, 10.4, 10.3. The mean is 10.30, s = 0.158 and uA = 0.158 / √5 = 0.0707. An instrument with a maximum permissible error of ±0.2 gives 0.2 / √3 = 0.1155, a reference with U = 0.1 at k = 2 gives 0.05, and a resolution of 0.1 gives 0.1 / (2√3) = 0.0289.
uc = √(0.0707² + 0.1155² + 0.05² + 0.0289²) = 0.147. The effective degrees of freedom are 0.147⁴ / (0.0707⁴ / 4) = 75, so the Student factor is 1.99, practically 2. U = 2 · 0.147 = 0.29, and the result is 10.30 ± 0.29 at k = 2.
Questions
What is the difference between error and uncertainty? Error is the difference from the true value, which is unknown. Uncertainty describes the spread of values that can be attributed to the quantity on the available evidence, and it can be evaluated from readings and documents.
How is a maximum permissible error converted to a standard uncertainty? With no other information the distribution is taken as rectangular and the standard uncertainty is a / √3.
When can k = 2 be used? When the effective degrees of freedom are large, in practice above about 30. With few readings and a dominant Type A contribution the Student factor is used instead and is larger than 2.
Is an uncertainty budget required for accreditation? Laboratories accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 have to evaluate measurement uncertainty for their results, and the budget is the usual way to show it.
Repeatability limits, control charts and precision checks on your own series are computed by the laboratory QC calculator.
Area from coordinates calculator: shoelace formula for survey plots
Bearing and distance from coordinates: survey inverse calculator
Rotating shift patterns: covering the posts and balancing the hours
Calibration intervals: setting them, shortening them, defending them
Turning an estimate into a bill of quantities that foots
Progress billing: percent complete, carry-forward and retention
Checking claimed quantities: the design schedule and the survey
Pile capacity from CPT: how the LCPC method reads a cone trace
Driven and bored piles: why the same soil gives different capacity
What belongs on a borehole log, and what quietly gets left off
Drawing a cross section: correlating layers between boreholes
From an AGS4 file to a laboratory summary: what the groups carry
Characteristic values: turning a set of test results into one number
Void ratio, porosity and saturation from one density test
When one soil layer is really two: splitting geotechnical units
ASTM D4254 minimum index density: procedure and Dr calculator
Relative density Dr and density index Id are not the same number
USCS classification step by step: ASTM D2487
Cu and Cc: what the two gradation coefficients actually tell you
Dual symbols in USCS: the 5 to 12 percent fines band
EN ISO 14688-1 against USCS: two different size ladders
AGS4 file validation: what the rules actually check
AGS4 syntax: the five rules that break a delivery
ASTM D2435 oedometer test: from the curve to Cc, mv and Eoed
Converting oedometer modulus to Young’s modulus
EN ISO 17892-5 and ASTM D2435: where the two diverge
ASTM D1196 plate load test: modulus and subgrade reaction
DIN 18134: Ev1, Ev2 and the compaction ratio
Ménard pressuremeter modulus: ASTM D4719 and EN ISO 22476-4
Hydraulic conductivity from a pumping test: Dupuit calculator and formulas
Shewhart control chart constants: A2, A3, B3, B4, D3, D4, d2, c4
The eight out of control tests on a Shewhart chart
Repeatability and reproducibility limits: where 2.77 comes from
How rebar cutting plans are optimised: the cutting stock problem
Cutting waste in rebar fabrication: what percentage is normal
Rebound hammer calibration: why the factory curve is not enough
Kerf and offcut: what a linear cutting plan has to account for
Earthwork volume from survey points: grid, TIN and cross sections
Fire load density: the formula, the calorific values and the traps
Explosive atmosphere zones 0, 1, 2 and 20, 21, 22 explained
Pollution charges per tonne: how the over-limit multiplier works
The Russian environmental fee: who pays, when, and how the advances work